May 17th is getting closer and for British Columbians, this election day is also going to be a referendum day. We are going to be asked if we support the changes to our voting system proposed by the Citizen's Assembly on Electoral Reform. This has been quite a magnificent process but the last steps might been seen to have faltered a little. The Citizen's Assembly is proposing that BC change its voting system to one based on what is called the Single Transferable Vote system (STV).
STV is not an easy system to fully get your head around. And we need to educate ourselves as to its benefits and problems. The government has not done a great job with this in my view.
So here for your viewing pleasure and feedback is Arjun's one pager on BC STV:
Why
are we being asked to vote on this proposed change to our voting
system?
In
2004, the BC government set up a body called the Citizen's Assembly
on Electoral Reform. The Assembly was made up of 160 BC citizens, broadly representative of the province's overall population, and its goal was to examine our current voting system
and propose any changes they felt could improve the system. The
Assembly decided to propose that the citizens of BC change our voting
system to a system called the BC Single Transferable vote – or
BC-STV for short.
What
is BC – STV? How is it different from our current voting system?
With
our current voting system, BC is divided into 79 electoral ridings
which each elect one representative each to Victoria. When we vote,
we make a mark (often an X) besides the name of one candidate.
With
BC-STV, BC would be divided into a smaller number of electoral
ridings which would each elect more than one representative to
Victoria. There would be the same number representatives elected (79)
and each riding would have between 2 and 7 representatives. The
ridings would be geographically larger. When we vote, instead of
voting for just one person, we would be given the opportunity to rank
the candidates in order of preference. We can rank as many, or as few
candidates, as we want.
The
argument for BC-STV
the
number of seats a political party wins in the legislature will more
closely reflect the party's percentage of the popular vote.
voters
will have more choice of candidates for which to vote.
local
representation maintained or even enhanced. Now, there is more than
one MLA representing you.
The
argument against BC- STV
the
increased size of the ridings will make it harder for MLAs to
adequately represent everyone.
votes
in rural ridings might be said to count less than votes in urban
ridings. It might only take 15% of the vote to elect someone in
Vancouver but it might take 30% of the vote to elect someone in
Prince George.
with
more parties and more interests represented in Victoria, it might
be harder to get things done.
Update (April 7th 2005) - 3 Useful STV Web Sites